Year of the Comet
Comet C/2011 L4 (PANSTARRS)

PANSTARRS information

Comet C/2012 S1 (ISON)

ISON information

Astronomy News
E-mail Article to a FriendPrint ArticleBookmark and Share

Chandra suggests rare explosion created our galaxy’s youngest black hole

Supernova remnant W49B formed when material near the parent star’s poles ejected at a much higher speed than that emanating from its equator.
By Chandra X-ray Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts, NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C. Published: February 14, 2013
w49b
W49B is a highly distorted supernova remnant, produced by a rare type of explosion. // X-ray: NASA/CXC/MIT/L.Lopez et al.; Infrared: Palomar; Radio: NSF/NRAO/VLA
New data from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory suggest a highly distorted supernova remnant may contain the most recent black hole formed in the Milky Way Galaxy. The remnant appears to be the product of a rare explosion in which matter is ejected at high speeds along the poles of a rotating star.

The remnant, called W49B, is about a thousand years old and located about 26,000 light-years away. “W49B is the first of its kind to be discovered in the galaxy,” said Laura Lopez from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge. “It appears its parent star ended its life in a way that most others don’t.”

Usually when a massive star runs out of fuel, the central region of the star collapses, triggering a chain of events that quickly culminate in a supernova explosion. Most of these explosions are generally symmetrical, with the stellar material blasting away more or less evenly in all directions.

However, in the W49B supernova, material near the poles of the doomed rotating star was ejected at a much higher speed than material emanating from its equator. Jets shooting away from the star’s poles mainly shaped the supernova explosion and its aftermath.

The remnant now glows brightly in X-rays and other wavelengths, offering the evidence for a peculiar explosion. By tracing the distribution and amounts of different elements in the stellar debris field, researchers were able to compare the Chandra data to theoretical models of how a star explodes. For example, they found iron in only half of the remnant while other elements such as sulfur and silicon were spread throughout. This matches predictions for an asymmetric explosion.

“In addition to its unusual signature of elements, W49B also is much more elongated and elliptical than most other remnants,” said Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz of the University of California, Santa Cruz. “This is seen in X-rays and several other wavelengths and points to an unusual demise for this star.”

Because supernova explosions are not well understood, astronomers want to study extreme cases like the one that produced W49B. The relative proximity of W49B also makes it extremely useful for detailed study.

The authors examined what sort of compact object the supernova explosion left behind. Most of the time, massive stars that collapse into supernovae leave a dense, spinning core called a neutron star. Astronomers often can detect neutron stars through their X-ray or radio pulses, although sometimes an X-ray source is seen without pulsations. A careful search of the Chandra data revealed no evidence for a neutron star. The lack of such evidence implies a black hole may have formed.

“It’s a bit circumstantial, but we have intriguing evidence the W49B supernova also created a black hole,” said Daniel Castro from MIT. “If that is the case, we have a rare opportunity to study a supernova responsible for creating a young black hole.”

Supernova explosions driven by jets like the one in W49B have been linked to gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) in other objects. GRBs, which have been seen only in distant galaxies, also are thought to mark the birth of a black hole. There is no evidence the W49B supernova produced a GRB, but it may have properties, including being jet-driven and possibly forming a black hole, that overlap with those of a GRB.

Find us on FacebookFind us on Twitter
User Comments
Be the first to leave your comment below!

Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Register Today!
 
3 stars
RICHARD MCCONNELL from UNITED KINGDOM said:
Dear Astronomy. I believe Brian Brewer has identitied a weakness in your reporting. Perhaps you should make it normal practice to include the astronomical coordinates of unusual spatial phenomena such as this in your reports, so that interested amateurs (some of whom have quite sophisticated equipment) can try to observe them for themselves!
4 stars
CLIFFORD J DAVIS from KENTUCKY said:
Since the explosion was asymmetric maybe the remnant was kicked out of the cloud and could now be far away from the region of the image. How can we find it?
ROBERT A MORSTADT from UTAH said:
The researchers probably mean that the supernova occurred 26,000 years plus 1,000 years ago. We are seeing just now the light of the explosion as it appeared 1,000 years after the event.
MARTIN VANN from NORTH CAROLINA said:
Colin, I believe the explanation would be that the Supernova is 26,000 light years away and exploded 27,000 years ago. This means we are seeing it as it was 1000 years after the explosion.
COLIN LISTER from UNITED KINGDOM said:
the laws of physics must have changed.. how can a 1000 year old object that is 26000 light years away be known about let alone be seen in any way at all?
4 stars
BRIAN BREWER from WEST VIRGINIA said:
I wonder if the data suggests the star had an unusually strong magnetic field and that the matter ejected followed the magnetic force lines? Also, where is this supernova remnant? Is the remnant visible looking through an optical telescope on Earth or is it only visible from orbiting telescopes?
5 stars
ALI BAGHERI from IRAN said:
thank you.
SEARCH SITE
Subscriber Only Access
Subscriber Only Content
Look for this icon. This denotes premium subscriber content. Learn more »
Become a Member of Astronomy.com
Register today for access to more valuable resource information.
Interact in our forums, comment on articles, receive our newsletter and much more!
Not a member?
Subscriber and Member Login
Password
Remember me